Share this article
Latest news
With KB5043178 to Release Preview Channel, Microsoft advises Windows 11 users to plug in when the battery is low
Copilot in Outlook will generate personalized themes for you to customize the app
Microsoft will raise the price of its 365 Suite to include AI capabilities
Death Stranding Director’s Cut is now Xbox X|S at a huge discount
Outlook will let users create custom account icons so they can tell their accounts apart easier
Microsoft Research says there’s nothing wrong with using weak passwords
2 min. read
Published onJuly 16, 2014
published onJuly 16, 2014
Share this article
Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help Windows Report sustain the editorial teamRead more
Passwords are something we all have to deal with on a daily basis, and the advice has long been to use complex passphrases, to use unique passwords for each site and service, and to change them on a regular basis. But Microsoft Research has different ideas. A paper published by researchers Dinei Florencio and Cormac Herley and Paul C. van Oorschot from Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada suggests taking a rather different approach.
The paper recognizes that users now have a large portfolio of passwords to remember, and goes on to say that “mandating exclusively strong passwords with no re-use gives users an impossible task”. What does this mean? Essentially, the researchers are saying that by encouraging, or even forcing, users to select complex, lengthy, unique passwords, the likelihood of forgetting them is greatly increased.
The researchers admit that their findings “directly challenge accepted wisdom and conventional advice”, but continues to say that “portfolio strategy ruling out weak passwords or password re-use is sub-optimal”. The use and re-use of simple passwords for low-risk websites is not only not discouraged by the paper, but actively encouraged. Strong, difficult-to-remember password should be reserved for sites and services that pose a high risk.
The aim is to overcome the problem of poor memory. If you have super-strong, unique passwords for every site and services, sure you’ll probably keep out the bad guys, but there’s a high chance that you’ll also lock yourself out when you ultimately forget them. You could write them down, but this defeats the purpose of a password. Password managers are another solution, but they are not perfect and can be vulnerable to attack. There is also the problem of the “finite-effort user” to take into account — users can only be expected to be willing to do so much in the name of secure access.
While the advice of the paper comes across as slightly counter intuitive to start with, with a little consideration it is easy to understand the thinking behind the advice — which boils down to the question “why make life any harder than it needs to be?” It’s a trade-off between the level of security you want, and the amount of effort you want to put in.
Radu Tyrsina
Radu Tyrsina has been a Windows fan ever since he got his first PC, a Pentium III (a monster at that time).
For most of the kids of his age, the Internet was an amazing way to play and communicate with others, but he was deeply impressed by the flow of information and how easily you can find anything on the web.
Prior to founding Windows Report, this particular curiosity about digital content enabled him to grow a number of sites that helped hundreds of millions reach faster the answer they’re looking for.
User forum
0 messages
Sort by:LatestOldestMost Votes
Comment*
Name*
Email*
Commenting as.Not you?
Save information for future comments
Comment
Δ
Radu Tyrsina
